Online subscriber? Please Log In
  

Need Help? | Forgot Your Password?

Consultants share urban renewal vision

Apr 11, 2012 | 3 Comments


By Nicole Montesano
Of the News-Register


Only online subscribers may access this article. Subscribe online by clicking here. Already a subscriber, please .

Would you like to comment on this article?

Only online subscribers may comment on articles. Click here to see how you can subscribe.
Already a subscriber, please

Note: Some articles do not accept comments at all.

Comments

11:43 am - Thu, April 12 2012
notanativethankgod said:
Shouldn't this money be put to better use such as repaving the roads in the older part of McMinnville, or fixing the potholes correctly all over the city. Or fixing the roads that were messed up when they cut into them to lay fiberoptic cable? Or perhaps the highways leading to the town. Have you traveled 18 lately? Yikes! Or maybe bringing new places to shop and eat like a Target, or a Costco, or Trader Joe's or anything else besides Walmart, pizza, Chinese and fast food? Wouldn't that make jobs and generate revenue and improve economic vitality? Seems to me that whomever is in charge of this renewal plan is too worried about attracting people here but not really worried about the people that already live here. Not sure how this "district" will improve my or my family's life, or anyone else's. Not to mention all the congestion it will attract. I just don't understand. Who is running this town? For the love of...
04:42 pm - Thu, April 12 2012
Kathleen Blair said:
$1.5 million would go a long way to replace the Three Mile Lane Bridge which connects McMinnville to our nearest hospital and to our National Guard Unit. The bridge is in scary bad shape and even a small earthquake (this is earthquake country) can easily either bring it down, or just make it unusable. @notanativethankgod - in answer to your question as to who runs the town - the answer is The Developer Mafia and all they care about is making $$$.
01:15 pm - Fri, April 13 2012
Don Dix said:
"Urban renewal districts temporarily alter the internal distribution property tax money among the various jurisdictions, but don�t increase the total tax bite, she said. The problem, she said, is that the redistribution shows up on property tax statements and is often mistaken for an increase."

'Temporarily altering distribution' of property tax statements is a clever way to avoid any admission that taxes will increase.

Let's see, property owners will most likely be responsible to pay for mandated improvements -- sidewalks, property access (approaches), and any possible new utility hookups. And with these 'improvements' will soon follow a reassessed property value, upwards. To expect anything 'but' a raise in taxes, one would have to be a little naive.

And yes, Kathleen, that bridge work would be a sensible and needed use of public money -- but since when has spending other people's money ever been influenced by common sense?
© 1999- News-Register Publishing | © The Associated Press
The News-Register and NewsRegister.com are owned and operated by News-Register Publishing Co., P.O. Box 727, McMinnville, OR 97128.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Web design & powered by LVSYS