Online subscriber? Please Log In

Need Help? | Forgot Your Password?

MDA conducting downtown smoking survey

Jun 23, 2014 | 6 Comments

By Molly Walker
Of the News-Register

Only online subscribers may access this article. Subscribe online by clicking here. Already a subscriber, please .

Would you like to comment on this article?

Only online subscribers may comment on articles. Click here to see how you can subscribe.
Already a subscriber, please

Note: Some articles do not accept comments at all.


06:35 am - Tue, June 24 2014
Rotwang said:
If I couldn't smoke outdoors on a windy day, I'd be less inclined to go and spend money downtown.
02:07 pm - Wed, June 25 2014
diana said:
Thing are out of control .you guys are caring the smoking to far ,,I don't smoke anymore ,,none smokers are thinking they have the right to tell everyone how they should live and what they can and cant do ,when and where ,come on you guys don't own the outdoors.
08:51 pm - Wed, June 25 2014
scooter said:
So we counted over two dozen cigarette butts in front of one business today. Should we cite everyone of those people with littering? Should the one person who smokes ask all 20 people in a restaurant, who have to smell that smoke instead of the food they paid for, to get a life and stop bothering him.

Smokers feel like they are under attack, guess what..... you are. If smoking added positively to the environment then it would be welcomed. If smoking didn't kill tens of thousands of people every year then it probably wouldn't be much of an issue.

Instead we all pay inflated costs to cover the inherent expense of smoking. For every person that wouldn't come shop downtown due to smoking there would be ten more that would love to come and shop if they saw that their town was clean and beautiful, not just an ashtray for selfish people who can't possibly be bothered to be considerate of those around them.
10:09 am - Thu, June 26 2014
Spongebob said:
As articulate as diana is, I must take isssue with her concern. I may not "own the outdoors", as she so insightfully points out, but I should have the right to stroll the public square without being forced to inhale the poisons of second-hand cigarette smoke. This isn't a matter of telling other people how they should live, as much as it is about smokers being "considerate of those around them", as expressed by scooter. This isn't an elitist position by us "none smokers"; it is simply a matter of common courtesy for all of us that share the air. Pollution of any kind is never good.
10:19 pm - Fri, June 27 2014
Seabiscuit said:
So, this is really looking to be a case of "here we go again".

Laws are on the books, "“But downtown, where shops, restaurants, wine tasting rooms and offices are so close together, it’s nearly impossible to use tobacco products and stay the required 10 feet away from doors or windows.” If the laws on the books are not going to be enforced, then why make up another one?

I can't think of a single place along 3rd between Adams and the RR tracks where it would be legal to smoke, unless you were standing in the middle of a street at an intersection. Then you would have another law to worry about.

If the law covering smoking within 10 feet of doors and windows, offensive littering, etc. is NOT being enforced, then why are we wasting time and tax payer money (County Health Dept) taking a worthless survey to create another law (" if downtown tobacco use was prohibited") that probably won't be enforced just like the laws that are already on the books?
08:03 am - Thu, July 3 2014
kona said:
Seabiscuit is correct. I guess the survey is to just get leverage to enforce the law which shouldn't be necessary.

© 1999- News-Register Publishing | © The Associated Press
The News-Register and are owned and operated by News-Register Publishing Co., P.O. Box 727, McMinnville, OR 97128.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Web design & powered by LVSYS