Online subscriber? Please Log In
  

Need Help? | Forgot Your Password?

Full speed ahead for the bypass

Sep 2, 2013 | 5 Comments


By Nathalie Hardy
Of the News-Register


Only online subscribers may access this article. Subscribe online by clicking here. Already a subscriber, please .

Would you like to comment on this article?

Only online subscribers may comment on articles. Click here to see how you can subscribe.
Already a subscriber, please

Note: Some articles do not accept comments at all.

Comments

08:29 am - Wed, September 4 2013
caroljane said:
The caption on the picture shown above (on page 7 of the print edition) says the bypass starts at Highway 217--wow, that's a lot longer than I thought it was going to be. Do you proofread??
10:13 am - Wed, September 4 2013
Reporter Starla Pointer said:
Thanks for catching the typo -- of course, it's Highway 219 that's the start of the bypass.
07:34 pm - Wed, September 4 2013
jyod541 said:
If you have ever been caught in that Dundee snag, a little dust, rocks and dirt is minor.
05:53 pm - Sat, September 7 2013
concrete said:
It seems as though there is a "bypass intoxication" that causes all the issues to be completely overlooked with this project. First, in order to supposedly make this work, the fishhook will add yet another stoplight to 99W. In case the designers haven't noticed, it's the stoplight in Dundee coupled with a two lane road through town that has caused this mess to begin with. Why not do a split overpass so that traffic can merge on and off 99W without all the fishhook stoplight mess? Next, how is 99W traffic suppose to get to and from the east end of the bypass? Springbrook Road appears to be the route. So, left turn off of 99W at the Springbrook Road intersection, followed by another left turn at 219/Springbrook intersection. It will be such a mess that traffic will not go that direction. My prediction, the day this two lane cowpath (er, bypass) opens traffic will be worse than it is now - nearly $400 million dollars spent and the situation will be worse than what it is now. Is there a problem currently? Yes. Is this panacea expensive poorly designed two lane bypass the answer? No. It will further compound an already bad traffic problem. There are better answers...........please stop the intoxication.
09:10 pm - Thu, September 12 2013
kona said:
Yes, but we will have a Bypass. The "leaders" will be able to pat themselves on the back and the newspaper will be happy. It doesn't matter that the "fix" will be a dangerous two-lane truck filled highway. That will be just another reason to ask for more money to make it a four lane mess. Wait until the "traffic dampening" structures are put in place in Dundee to divert as much traffic as possible onto the Bypass. Yes, this will be the most expensive ODOT project in history for 3.8 miles of more problems, but the satisfaction for some will be important.

© 1999- News-Register Publishing | © The Associated Press
The News-Register and NewsRegister.com are owned and operated by News-Register Publishing Co., P.O. Box 727, McMinnville, OR 97128.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Web design & powered by LVSYS