Council raises white flag on UGB
Mar 28, 2012 | 1 Comment
By Nicole Montesano
Of the News-Register
Only online subscribers may access this article. Subscribe online by clicking here . Already a subscriber, please log in
• Crash claims life of Newberg High School junior (6739)
• Video showing use of excessive force by local officers goes public (4268)
• Recent rash of thefts in Mac (3836)
• City and county sued for excessive use of force (3445)
• Bling sale generates more than $15,000 (2035)
• New agritourism discussion deserves full public hearing (1684)
• Roberts, Carter win Mac school board seats (1394)
• Bill would trample on public's right to know (1387)
• Surveillance photos trigger arrest (1333)
• Window winners announced (1057)
• City and county sued for excessive use of force (6)
• New agritourism discussion deserves full public hearing (4)
• Oregon budget talks gain momentum with econ report (2)
• Dribbling 'free spirit' touches local family before untimely death (1)
• Bill would trample on public's right to know (1)
• Recent rash of thefts in Mac (1)
• Window winners announced (1)
• Crash claims life of Newberg High School junior (1)


Would you like to comment on this article?
Only online subscribers may comment on articles. Click here to see how you can subscribe.
Already a subscriber, please log in
Comments
While the city has been attempting to fulfill state-mandated expansion of the UGB (20 year supply of available land for development), a small group of NIMBYs have staked out Mac as the battleground to thwart any and all common sense approaches to land use.
Why? Apparently because the system allows it. One appeal leads to another, this lawsuit replaces that one, and any negative court decision is quickly appealed to a higher court. The basic tactic is delay, which by nature, leads to mounting costs.
The city's legal staff has been answering and explaining the UGB plan to LCDC, LUBA, and the Oregon courts for 17 years! If one has any experience as to the cost of legal representation, then it should be no surprise that Mac has spent well over 7 digits to defend any expansion during that time.
So, a few malcontents can waste precious tax dollars at whim, without any responsibility or consequences -- they are allowed to complain, file suit, appeal, and re-appeal -- and walk.
The odds are great that if Oregon's court system allowed the tested application of 'loser pays' to apply to land use, this foolish nonsense would diminish considerably. That in turn would leave the city's finances in much better shape, and more funds would be available for necessities within the community.
Wouldn't it be sweet justice to 'move the goalposts' on those who have perfected the art?