Church settles abuse case out of court
Mar 3, 2012 | 9 Comments
By Nicole Montesano
Of the News-Register
Only online subscribers may access this article. Subscribe online by clicking here . Already a subscriber, please log in
• High speed pursuit ends in McMinnville (4700)
• Sheriff's office investigating rock quarry theft (3497)
• A simple message for the people of 'O' (2701)
• Did Oregon miss chance to stop a serial killer? (2656)
• Clair Sarsozo - Navigating grief (2491)
• Video showing use of excessive force by local officers goes public (2371)
• Need warm couch Saturday night; will contribute game of juggle (2192)
• Weekend Tempo 5/10/2013 (2007)
• Dribbling 'free spirit' touches local family before untimely death (1956)
• A simple message for the people of 'O' (6)
• City and county sued for excessive use of force (5)
• Need warm couch Saturday night; will contribute game of juggle (3)
• Grange proves a hit with vendors, shoppers (2)
• Oregon Senate OKs bill letting moms keep placentas (2)
• Oregon budget talks gain momentum with econ report (2)
• New agritourism discussion deserves full public hearing (2)
• Mixed media (1)


Would you like to comment on this article?
Only online subscribers may comment on articles. Click here to see how you can subscribe.
Already a subscriber, please log in
Comments
"As both Steele and his wife are deceased, no one was available to testify in his defense. However, when the lawsuit was filed, his adult children issued a statement denying the allegations."
If no one was able to testify [defend] Mr. Steele, is he automatically guilty? Reading the story makes it sound like he is. Is he guilty because the church agreed to settle out of court? I wish I could understand the law pertaining to this.
I'm not sure whether it was actually the church that made the decision to settle or its insurance company. It's usually the insurance company, which makes a cold calculation of potential gains and losses, then opts for the decision making the most actuarial and mathematical sense.
While the terms were not disclosed, and I am not privy to them, I suspect the payout here was pretty modest. And I suspect it was covered by an insurance company to the extent it exceeded the deductible, typically about $5,000.
These are challenging cases for all concerned. The incentive to settle is very high, as both proving and disproving are very dicey and difficult propositions.
Steve Bagwell
Managing Editor
Appearances can be deceiving. Child molesters don't often look the part. In fact, they are often upstanding people in the community. The point is that they don't want to be suspected.
I'm not saying this guy was guilty, but him appearing to be a good guy is not proof that he was innocent.
I am disappointed that the Church/insurance company made a settlement. Something is missing. I wish the News-Register would dig another level deeper in the information.